Nov
16

Rules We Wish OWS Knew

I got the list from an email and thought that it would be nice if the OWS people had learned them when they were in high school.

  1. Life is not fair – get used to it!
  2. The world doesn’t care about your self-esteem. The world will expect you to accomplish something BEFORE you feel good about yourself.
  3. You will NOT make $60,000 a year right out of high school. You won’t be a vice-president with a car phone until you earn both.
  4. If you think your teacher is tough, wait till you get a boss.
  5. Flipping burgers is not beneath your dignity. Your Grandparents had a different word for burger flipping – they called it opportunity.
  6. If you mess up, it’s not your parents’ fault, so don’t whine about your mistakes, learn from them.
  7. Before you were born, your parents weren’t as boring as they are now. They got that way from paying your bills, cleaning your clothes and listening to you talk about how cool you think you are: So before you save the rain forest from the parasites of your parent’s generation, try delousing the closet in your own room.
  8. Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life HASN’T. In some schools, they have abolished failing grades and they’ll give you as MANY TIMES as you want to get the right answer. *This doesn’t bear the slightest resemblance to ANYTHING in real life.
  9. Life is not divided into semesters. You don’t get summers off and very few employers are interested in helping you FIND YOURSELF – that’s for your own time.
  10. Television is NOT real life. In real life people actually have to leave the coffee shop and go to jobs.
  11. Be nice to nerds. Chances are you’ll end up working for one!!
  12. Before you ask whether somebody else deserves what they have, ask yourself what you have earned.

Permanent link to this article: http://everydayannoyances.org/politics/rules-we-wish-ows-knew/

Aug
09

Demagogueing Gridlock

After waiting more than two days to respond to Standard & Poor’s downgrade of US credit to AA+ President Obama showed that he really is a one-trick pony by blaming everything but his own incompetent administration. He called attention to the earthquake that damaged Japan and the Arab Spring (which he supports) then sniped at S&P, saying that Warren Buffet would give America a quadruple A rating, and then got down to the real job at hand, demagogueing the TEA Party and Republicans.

Obama blamed the political process of raising the debt ceiling for the downgrade blaming the political right for not giving him his way without a fight. With various Democrat politicians and virtually all of the unpaid White House press secretaries in the lamestream media finally finding somebody that they feel safe about calling terrorists Obama is, once again, leading from behind on that issue. The fact that his own proposed budget failed to get even a single vote in the senate was studiously ignored. The fact that he had solid majorities in all three branches of government for two years and didn’t do a thing about the deficit, except raise it to record levels, was also avoided. The fact that the TEA party was formed in response to his own profligacy and that the 2010 elections were the American people’s judgement of his administration

Apparently the president feels that the problem lies with our system of government. If he had things all his way there wouldn’t be any problems.  He believes his policies of increasing spending and expanding government control over every facet of our lives is fine.

And the good news here is that by coming together to deal with the long-term debt challenge, we would have more room to implement key proposals that can get the economy to grow faster.

Spending more money must make the economy grow, except that for the government to do that it must first either take that money out of the economy in taxes, borrow the money somewhere else or just print more money.

With respect to debt, our problem is not confidence in our credit — the markets continue to reaffirm our credit as among the world’s safest.

He also thinks that people are out there standing in line to loan us money. I guess he wasn’t referring to the Dow Jones as it was already down about 500 points as he made his twice delayed speech.

Obama thinks that he needs a freer hand to change things. He gets frustrated when he has to do things the old-fashioned way, by working together with people whose political views don’t match his own. He claims that the political process is slowing down “Change We Can Believe In” and this frustrates and burdens him. He said so.

Obama does not like the way the the government is set up in the constitution.

Obama never stops to think that the founding fathers, in their wisdom, set things up intentionally to stop people like him from doing too much damage. The United States Constitution is not messy, trying to work around it while pretending to follow it definitely is.

Permanent link to this article: http://everydayannoyances.org/politics/demagogueing-gridlock/

Aug
04

Capitalism’s Bum Rap

cap·i·tal·ism

[kap-i-tl-iz-uhm]

–noun

an economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth.

Link

cap·i·tal·ist

[kap-i-tl-ist]

noun

1. a person who has capital, especially extensive capital, invested in business enterprises.

2. an advocate of capitalism.

3. a very wealthy person.

Whenever those of leftist political persuasion think about capitalists they reflexively look at the most negative version of choice number 3 above and with their zero-sum version of economics they have visions of:

  • The men pictured on the Monopoly cards.
  • Ebenezer Scrooge
  • Robber Barons
  • Gordon Gecko from the movie “Wall Street”

While there are capitalist overtones to all of the above the leftists are oversimplifying the issues and only looking at the negatives. The political left instinctively feel that the acquisition of wealth is driven by greed and selfishness. True socialists like the current president don’t believe that any sort of economic power should be allowed to be in private hands. Having people that they cannot control making economic decisions is a complete anathema to them but they are completely blind to their own greed and selfishness as explained by Milton Friedman in the video below.

Milton Friedman on Donohue

Back before the industrial revolution there were no factories churning out thousands of consumer products at affordable prices. Things were hand made and thus to buy an item you needed to pay enough for the time taken to make it. If an item took somebody a week to make he had to live during that time and in some cases also provide for his family. Something as simple as a cloth shirt may have been the product of weeks of man hours in total from production of the base fibres, dying, spinning, weaving and finally cutting and sewing. Such simple items cost so much that many people could not afford them and had to make do with leather or other materials which did not take as much labor to produce.  

When machines were made that could quickly do the a lot of the work that used to take people a lot longer to perform things became cheaper for everybody. The machines that are used cost money to build and to start a factory required amounts that the average person does not possess. Those with the wealth required invested their capital in the machines and were known as “capitalists”.

The capitalists did not act out of altruism, they saw an opportunity to increase their wealth and took the risk of buying the machinery, hiring people to operate them and building a factory. When Henry Ford expressed his dream of the average person being able to buy a car due to his innovative approach to manufacturing he believed that the mobility he added to the general populace would be beneficial to them but you can also bet that he pictured the Ford logo on the cars in his vision.

This is an example of non-zero-sum economics. Both parties benefit from the transaction. The same sort of transactions are carried out billions of times every day. What the political left really means when they talk about the evils of capitalism is the free market system where people can decide to buy bread from one baker or any other according to their personal preferences and convenience.

When you buy a loaf of bread from the baker you obviously think that you benefit from the deal otherwise you wouldn’t do it. The baker is happy because he makes a little money on the transaction which he can then spend on something he needs more than the money.

Neither you or the baker have so much money that you can have everything you want because the people involved in making. mining or growing goods or performing the services you want also have costs involved and they also need to have enough money to live on. This means that there can never be enough of anything to satisfy everybody in the world. That is called scarcity. Just as diamonds are valuable due to scarcity so is lumber, wheat, oil, clothing and expertise.

The abundance or scarcity of these things determines their prices as the owner will sell for the best price he can get the same way that you do when you sell unneeded items at your garage sale. if you set the prices too high then nobody will buy, too low and everything will be sold quickly but your wallet will be thinner. Wanting to get the best prices for your stuff is what the political left would have you believe is greed and selfishness.

The same applies when you decide to buy a couple of items rather than just one because they are on sale right now or asking for a discount when you buy in bulk. If you get a better job offer and either change employers or ask your present employer for a raise to keep you from going then you are taking advantage of a higher market price for your expertise. In all of these cases the left want you to feel guilty about your self interest.

The political left save their worst rhetoric for businesses that behave exactly the way that you do on a personal level when they sell for the best price they can get or buy raw materials in bulk to keep prices down. The bigger the business the more they demagogue. The political left rants against “capitalism” and sets up the “evil rich” as the target of their hatred. The political left particularly don’t want to use the words “free enterprise” to describe what they are against because that would show their real agenda, which is to abolish freedom.

Permanent link to this article: http://everydayannoyances.org/economics/capitalisms-bum-rap/

Jul
26

Obama’s Arrogance on the Debt Ceiling

Obama tried invoking Ronald Reagan yet again in his speech on the debt limit but I still haven’t heard any commentators mention one thing that I see as standing out in his speech. Leave out the usual class warfare talking points and the poll tested “balanced" approach” and you will see how he wants to be treated differently than his predecessors.

Obama invokes Reagan yet again on the debt limit.

Defaulting on our obligations is a reckless and irresponsible outcome to this debate.  And Republican leaders say that they agree we must avoid default.  But the new approach that Speaker Boehner unveiled today, which would temporarily extend the debt ceiling in exchange for spending cuts, would force us to once again face the threat of default just six months from now.  In other words, it doesn’t solve the problem. 

First of all, a six-month extension of the debt ceiling might not be enough to avoid a credit downgrade and the higher interest rates that all Americans would have to pay as a result.  We know what we have to do to reduce our deficits; there’s no point in putting the economy at risk by kicking the can further down the road.   

In fact the president has said repeatedly that he will not agree to any short term deals.

Understand – raising the debt ceiling does not allow Congress to spend more money.  It simply gives our country the ability to pay the bills that Congress has already racked up.  In the past, raising the debt ceiling was routine.  Since the 1950s, Congress has always passed it, and every President has signed it.  President Reagan did it 18 times.  George W. Bush did it 7 times.

(Emphasis added)

One fact that Obama pointedly did not mention is that he, Biden and Reid all voted against raising the debt ceiling for George W. Bush. No ideology involved there of course.

Reagan and Bush had the debt limit raised a total of 25 times over 16 years. Obama wants the largest increase ever with the fewest strings attached, as Speaker Boehner said “a blank check”. And he wants it done one time in four years just to make sure he doesn’t have people thinking about his spending while he campaigns for a second term.

Reagan deliberately increased defence spending and by doing so he caused the collapse of the Soviet regime, something that the left told him was not possible. The left still argue that Reagan was a doddering fool who was out of touch with reality. His tax cuts were decried as draining the US Treasury while, in fact, federal revenues doubled between 1980 and 1990.

George W. Bush had 9-11 on his watch and two wars which were started to prevent future attacks. Despite these “unfunded” wars he still handed Obama an economy which was 19% larger than he began with. What, exactly, has Obama done to deserve better treatment than Reagan or Bush?

Permanent link to this article: http://everydayannoyances.org/politics/obama-politics/obamas-arrogance-on-the-debt-ceiling/

Jul
25

The KKK Party

Kevin Jackson, author of The Big Black Lie and Sexy Brilliance and a long time TEA Party activist blogs at The Black Sphere and doesn’t back down even when the MSNBC talking head makes several attempts to get him back “on the reservation”. Note how the interviewer, after being unsuccessful at talking down the supposed interviewee is careful to tell the viewers that he didn’t get the answers he wanted.

Kevin Jackson Demolishes David Shuster on MSNBC from Jeremy Buff on Vimeo.

The interviewer gives up before Kevin can explain that the KKK was to the Democratic party what the PLO was to Fatah. For those who don’t know Abraham Lincoln, you know, the president that the lamestream media kept trying to compare Obama to, was a Republican. The people who most opposed the civil rights movement were southern democrats and they were also most of the KKK. Hell, the democrats had a former Grand Kleagle of the KKK in congress until he died in 2010.

In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who desired restoration of white supremacy.

When you see what the welfare system, largely the invention of and supported by Democrats, has done to black Americans you need to wonder if anything has really changed, especially if you see how they treat people like Supreme court justice Clarence Thomas.

Permanent link to this article: http://everydayannoyances.org/politics/history/the-kkk-party/

Page 1 of 912345...Last »